"Mega Resort", which signed an MoU with an organization Y, with which they have been saving endangered turtles since two years. But this year, they did not partner with this organisation. Rather, they partnered with another organization X.

Which of the following weakens the decision taken by the resort?

A) Organisation is focusing on tribal flora and fauna of the region. 

B) Mega Resort wants the best economic outcomes.

C) Organisation Y is a much more established and stable organisation as compared to Organisation X.

We take a look at the given statements as follows:

A) Organisation is focusing on tribal flora and fauna of the region. → Turtle conservation isn't essentially a part of tribal flora and fauna conservation. The organisation might have shifted its focus to a different objective all together. Hence, this statement doesn't weaken the decision. 

B) Mega Resort wants the best economic outcomes. → It might be the case that partnering with Company X leads to a more overall net profit for the resort. Hence, this statement doesn't weaken the decision. 

C) Organisation Y is a much more established and stable organisation as compared to Organisation X. → This might hamper or impact the decision due to the effective supremacy of Company Y over Company X. Hence, this statement does weaken the decision. 

Therefore, only statement C weakens the decision taken by the resort. 

Hence, only statement C weakens the decision.