In the question below a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II is given. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement : The interview panel may select a candidate who neither possesses the desired qualifications nor the values and attributes.

Conclusions :

I. The inclusion of specialists on the interview panel does not guarantee that the selection will be proper.

II. The interview test has certain limitations in the matter of selection of candidates.

Explanation: From the statement, it can be inferred that despite the presence of an interview panel, a candidate who does not meet the desired qualifications or values and attributes might still be selected.

Conclusion I: Having specialists (or any structured panel) does not ensure a perfect selection process, leading to the conclusion that the inclusion of specialists on the interview panel does not guarantee proper selection.

Conclusion II: The interview test has certain limitations in the matter of selection of candidates. In the statement, no mention of the limits in the personal interview.

Therefore, only conclusions I logically follow from the statement provided.

Hence, the correct answer is "Option (2)".