In the question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, logically follows from the given statement.

Statements: Money plant has thin leaves and requires more water.

Conclusion I: Plants with thin leaves require more water.

Conclusion II: Money plant cannot be grown in places with water scarcity.

For this question,

Statements: The money plant has thin leaves and requires more water.

This statement explains the requirements and speciality of the Money plant.

Conclusion I: Plants with thin leaves require more water..

It can not be true as the statement is all about the Money plants but except for money plants, there are more plants that have thin leaves.

Conclusion II: Money plants cannot be grown in places with water scarcity.

It is completely according to the statement as it is true.

Hence, Option (4) is correct.

Additional Information

• If there are two or more sentences that are used to frame a statement, then, the sentences must be interrelated, and mutual contradiction should be there.
• Do not look for truthful notions. The information provided in the statement is the only requirement for a student to answer the question. No assumptions must be made.
• Read the statement carefully and look for keywords that are common between the statement and the conclusions
• If there is more than one conclusion that is applicable to the statement, students must ensure that the conclusions they opt for have some relation with each other.