Directions: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement:

I: A huge crowd gathered at the JP stadium to watch the singer perform live.

II: JP stadium has a capacity of 1 lakh people.

Conclusion:

I: Not more than 1 lakh people attended the concert.

II: The singer is very popular. 

Statement:

I: A huge crowd gathered at the JP stadium to watch the singer perform live.

II: JP stadium has a capacity of 1 lakh people.

Conclusion:

I: Not more than 1 lakh people attended the concert - It Does follows( If the stadium has a capacity of 1 lakh people, it means that it cannot physically hold more than 1 lakh people. Therefore, the number of attendees cannot exceed this limit).

II: The singer is very popular - does not logically follow beyond a reasonable doubt. While a "huge crowd" (Statement I) might suggest popularity, it's not a guaranteed logical deduction. A huge crowd could gather for various reasons not directly related to the singer's popularity, such as a free concert, a unique event, extensive promotion, or a lack of other entertainment options. The statements only confirm a large attendance, not the underlying cause of that attendance as solely the singer's popularity).

Thus, Only conclusion I follows.

Hence, the correct answer is "Option 1".