Each statement is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.
Statement: Should there be high level of violence in films in the name of entertainment?
Arguments:
I. No. Exposure to high level of violence causes behavioural changes in human attitude particularly in children and youth there by developing criminal thoughts in mind.
II. Yes. When it is crucial for the story, producers have no other other.

Given statement: Should there be high level of violence in films in the name of entertainment

Given arguments:

I. No. Exposure to high level of violence causes behavioural changes in human attitude particularly in children and youth there by developing criminal thoughts in mind. → Strong

This arguments directly address the negative impact of violence in films, especially on children and youth, which is a major concern in the society.

II. Yes. When it is crucial for the story, producers have no other other. → Weak

This argument points out that sometimes violence is essential for the plot. However, it doesn't fully justify having a high level of violence as the statement says 'in the name of entertainment'. It suggest that violence may be needed in some stories, but it doesn't address whether excessive violence is justified purely for entertainment. 

Thus, Only I is strong.

Hence, "Option 1" is the correct answer.