The Land Acquisition Act MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for The Land Acquisition Act - Download Free PDF

The correct answer is '1894'.

Key Points

• Introduction of the first Land Acquisition Law in India:
  • The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was introduced during British rule in India. It was the first codified legal framework for acquiring private land for public purposes, such as infrastructure development or administrative needs.
  • This Act aimed to provide a systematic procedure for acquiring land while compensating landowners, though the compensation was often inadequate.
  • The Act empowered the government to compulsorily acquire land if it was deemed necessary for public use, with limited scope for the landowners to challenge the acquisition.
  • Post-independence, the Act continued to be in use but faced criticism for being outdated and unfair. It was eventually replaced by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Additional Information

• Overview of Incorrect Options:
  • Option 1 (1984): This year does not mark the introduction of the first land acquisition law. However, amendments to the 1894 Act were made during the 1980s to address some of its limitations, though these amendments were still considered inadequate.
  • Option 3 (1784): This year predates the codification of any formal land acquisition laws in India. During this period, British colonial interests focused on trade and governance, but no structured legal framework for land acquisition existed.
  • Option 4 (1694): This year falls within the early colonial era when the British East India Company was primarily engaged in trade activities. Legal frameworks for land acquisition were not established until much later.

• Legacy of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
  • The 1894 Act shaped land acquisition processes in India for over a century but was criticized for favoring the government and neglecting the rights of landowners and affected communities.
  • The Act lacked provisions for rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced persons, leading to widespread social and economic challenges.
  • Its replacement in 2013 was aimed at addressing these shortcomings by ensuring fair compensation, transparency, and rehabilitation measures.

The correct answer is option 2

Key Points 

• Section 49 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 specifies that if the owner of a house, manufactory, or other building desires the whole property to be acquired, the Act cannot be enforced to acquire only a part of it. Additionally, if there is a dispute regarding whether the land proposed for acquisition forms part of the property, the Collector must refer the matter to the Court before proceeding. If the government determines that the acquisition of the whole property is necessary due to unreasonable claims, they can order the acquisition of the entire property without the need for fresh proceedings.

The correct answer is Option 3

Key Points

• Section 43 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 clarifies that the provisions of Sections 39 to 42 do not apply when the government is bound by an agreement to provide land for a railway or another company. This typically involves agreements where the government has committed to supplying land, such as in the case of large infrastructure projects like railways. Therefore, the usual acquisition procedures under these sections are exempted in such cases.

The correct answer is option 2 

Key Points 

• Section 39 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 states that before land can be acquired for a company, the previous consent of the appropriate Government is required. Additionally, the company must execute an agreement as outlined in the section. This ensures that the process of land acquisition for a company is regulated and authorized by the appropriate authorities.

The correct answer is option 3

Key Points 

• Section 35(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 states that if there is a disagreement between the Collector and the persons interested about the sufficiency or apportionment of the compensation for the temporary occupation of waste or arable land, the Collector must refer the matter to the Court for decision. This ensures an impartial resolution of disputes regarding compensation.

The correct answer is '1894'.

Key Points

• Introduction of the first Land Acquisition Law in India:
  • The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was introduced during British rule in India. It was the first codified legal framework for acquiring private land for public purposes, such as infrastructure development or administrative needs.
  • This Act aimed to provide a systematic procedure for acquiring land while compensating landowners, though the compensation was often inadequate.
  • The Act empowered the government to compulsorily acquire land if it was deemed necessary for public use, with limited scope for the landowners to challenge the acquisition.
  • Post-independence, the Act continued to be in use but faced criticism for being outdated and unfair. It was eventually replaced by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Additional Information

• Overview of Incorrect Options:
  • Option 1 (1984): This year does not mark the introduction of the first land acquisition law. However, amendments to the 1894 Act were made during the 1980s to address some of its limitations, though these amendments were still considered inadequate.
  • Option 3 (1784): This year predates the codification of any formal land acquisition laws in India. During this period, British colonial interests focused on trade and governance, but no structured legal framework for land acquisition existed.
  • Option 4 (1694): This year falls within the early colonial era when the British East India Company was primarily engaged in trade activities. Legal frameworks for land acquisition were not established until much later.

• Legacy of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
  • The 1894 Act shaped land acquisition processes in India for over a century but was criticized for favoring the government and neglecting the rights of landowners and affected communities.
  • The Act lacked provisions for rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced persons, leading to widespread social and economic challenges.
  • Its replacement in 2013 was aimed at addressing these shortcomings by ensuring fair compensation, transparency, and rehabilitation measures.

The correct answer is Option 2Key Points Section 1:- Short Title, Extent, and Commencement:

• Short Title: This Act shall be called the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
• Extent: It extends to the whole of India, except the state of Jammu and Kashmir.
• Commencement: This Act shall come into force on the 1st day of March, 1894.

The correct answer is '1894'.

Key Points

• Introduction of the first Land Acquisition Law in India:
  • The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was introduced during British rule in India. It was the first codified legal framework for acquiring private land for public purposes, such as infrastructure development or administrative needs.
  • This Act aimed to provide a systematic procedure for acquiring land while compensating landowners, though the compensation was often inadequate.
  • The Act empowered the government to compulsorily acquire land if it was deemed necessary for public use, with limited scope for the landowners to challenge the acquisition.
  • Post-independence, the Act continued to be in use but faced criticism for being outdated and unfair. It was eventually replaced by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Additional Information

• Overview of Incorrect Options:
  • Option 1 (1984): This year does not mark the introduction of the first land acquisition law. However, amendments to the 1894 Act were made during the 1980s to address some of its limitations, though these amendments were still considered inadequate.
  • Option 3 (1784): This year predates the codification of any formal land acquisition laws in India. During this period, British colonial interests focused on trade and governance, but no structured legal framework for land acquisition existed.
  • Option 4 (1694): This year falls within the early colonial era when the British East India Company was primarily engaged in trade activities. Legal frameworks for land acquisition were not established until much later.

• Legacy of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
  • The 1894 Act shaped land acquisition processes in India for over a century but was criticized for favoring the government and neglecting the rights of landowners and affected communities.
  • The Act lacked provisions for rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced persons, leading to widespread social and economic challenges.
  • Its replacement in 2013 was aimed at addressing these shortcomings by ensuring fair compensation, transparency, and rehabilitation measures.

The correct answer is option 2

Key Points 

• Section 49 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 specifies that if the owner of a house, manufactory, or other building desires the whole property to be acquired, the Act cannot be enforced to acquire only a part of it. Additionally, if there is a dispute regarding whether the land proposed for acquisition forms part of the property, the Collector must refer the matter to the Court before proceeding. If the government determines that the acquisition of the whole property is necessary due to unreasonable claims, they can order the acquisition of the entire property without the need for fresh proceedings.

The correct answer is Option 3

Key Points

• Section 43 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 clarifies that the provisions of Sections 39 to 42 do not apply when the government is bound by an agreement to provide land for a railway or another company. This typically involves agreements where the government has committed to supplying land, such as in the case of large infrastructure projects like railways. Therefore, the usual acquisition procedures under these sections are exempted in such cases.

The correct answer is option 2 

Key Points 

• Section 39 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 states that before land can be acquired for a company, the previous consent of the appropriate Government is required. Additionally, the company must execute an agreement as outlined in the section. This ensures that the process of land acquisition for a company is regulated and authorized by the appropriate authorities.

The correct answer is option 3

Key Points 

• Section 35(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 states that if there is a disagreement between the Collector and the persons interested about the sufficiency or apportionment of the compensation for the temporary occupation of waste or arable land, the Collector must refer the matter to the Court for decision. This ensures an impartial resolution of disputes regarding compensation.

The correct answer is Option 2

Key Points 

• Section 33 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 allows the Court to order the deposited money to be invested in Government or approved securities if the money was deposited for reasons other than those covered under Section 31. The Court can then direct the payment in a manner that ensures the parties interested receive benefits similar to those they would have obtained from the land in question. This ensures fairness and compensates the interested parties appropriately.

The correct answer is option 2

Key Points 

• Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 states that if a person entitled to the compensation refuses to accept it, or if there is a dispute regarding the title to receive the compensation or its apportionment, the Collector will deposit the amount in the Court to which a reference would be made under Section 18. This ensures that the compensation is safely handled until the dispute is resolved.

The correct answer is option 2

Key Points 

• Under Section 27 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, if the Collector's award is not upheld, the costs of the proceedings are generally borne by the Collector. However, the Court may decide that the applicant’s claim was extravagant or that the applicant was negligent in presenting their case before the Collector. In such cases, the Court may reduce the applicant's costs or require them to pay part of the Collector's costs.